Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Thomas King

Pages: [1]
1
General Discussion / Integrity of the Network
« on: December 02, 2010, 08:56:09 PM »
Hi Brian, thank you for replying, I understand and agree with everything you have said.  But to clarify, I was talking about BUF in the past couple days.  Mr. Sal Barcia handled more than 5 planes in the past couple days I can assure you that.  I was watching.  It was more like in the 12-20 range in that shift for him.

But yes, I do appreciate a lengthy explination from you and agree with you.  I think there is stuff going on behind closed doors because if you guys are trying to get to the bottom of it, and didn't know about it, then there is something going on.

2
General Discussion / Integrity of the Network
« on: December 02, 2010, 02:58:36 PM »
From a ZOB standpoint, We (ZOB) can further our training efforts if the the Founders and BoG would just let us run it our way.  For years prior to the GRP release you go and look at ZOB's training records and you will find that we had 10 people on staff and training was being conducted every night.  Now with this new GRP, we have had less active members mainly because we have 3 Class B fields, only 1 of them is considered a "major".  Now VATSIM is trying to tell us that we need to COMPLETELY redo our training outline (Which I did in about a month of late nights).

Essentially back in our hayday, we gave the student an option as to which airport they would like to start their training at.  Naturally, people who lived in the Detroit area would choose KDTW to start their training, same goes for PIT and CLE.  Now we cannot do this.  We have to say "Ok read up on the PIT and CLE SOPs and we'll go over lesson 1 tomorrow" type of deal.  People don't want to train at 2 airports simultaneously.  This is where the Major/Minor cert lacks for us.  We are simultaneously training students on 2 rather large airports in the National Airspace Sysytem (Real World) and VATSIM and the makers of the GRP will not give them to us.  They based the major certification on traffic levels.  You want to talk about Traffic Levels?  I dare you to compare KBUF and KDTW in the past couple days.  No events have taken place at all, just pure people getting on the network.  So why not make KBUF a major?  It has more operations in the past week than KDTW.

Also, rumor has it that they want to take away KDTW from the Major certification list.  You have no idea how livid this makes me.  Here at ZOB we have 3 Class Bravo Airports, I don't know if that means anything to anybody else, but that sure as hell means something to me.  Now they are going to take away our only Major airport.  Look at any other ARTCC that have 3 Class B Airports and tell me is only 1 of them is considered a Major. Something isn't right.

My whole campagin when I was the DATM was to let us (James Hamilton and myself) run ZOB how we want to, and not be bound by these GRP rules.  I have written emails to Staff Members of the network, only to go unanswered (suprise?).  I ended up getting so tired of the politics, and the constant emails we would recive saying "Someone has complained about your training program..."  Only to find that they were completely false and in some cases exaderated to the point where it was false.

So Richard, if you want to talk about this 1:1 training, I will show you the flow chart I made for the Training staff on the steps and lessons required to comply with the GRP and you can see that even you would not want to go throgh what the GRP is making us go through from a training Standpoint.

TK

3
General Discussion / AOPA Video Question.
« on: October 09, 2010, 10:59:38 AM »
Well, you always trust the right instruments. coming out of a unusual attitude, you never look at the attitude indicator because it can tumble.  Then the Pitot-Static system can have some errors such as being iced over.  So being vigilant about turning your pitot heat on while in IMC would be a good idea so that you know you are reading correct information from the Airspeed indicator, because if not, and the pitot tube is iced over, the airspeed indicator would indicate an increase in airspeed.  Generally pilots would pull back more and more to reach the desired climbout speed but that only puts them into a stall.  Thats what I believe happened if this is talking about an inexperienced Private Pilot.  They never put there pitot heat on because thats something you aren't trained enough when going through PPL.

Its only when you get to insturment is when you learn to trust the right instruments.

4
The Flight Deck / Pilots flying JAX, MLB, DAB and MCO/ORL/SFB
« on: September 17, 2010, 09:41:05 AM »
not to start a thread about adding fields to the list, but could you give some insight for ZOB's request about 4 months ago to add CLE as a major field?  we also haven't heard anything.

5
General Discussion / Controller Test... <_<
« on: September 02, 2010, 03:08:12 PM »
Quote from: Kyle Barr
I am annoyed how I always get the Test wrong for the ATC for VATUSA. Im thinking why not VATSIM seeing how much you know about ATC and help you with the things you need to know. Please take the poll and tell me what you think if they shoudl start doing this or not.
Well to see what you need to know, we need to see what you do know.

6
General Discussion / Realistic DSR Client
« on: June 19, 2010, 10:36:09 AM »
Quote from: Harold Rutila
In particular, what would differ with the current DSR mode in VRC?

Im not a radar expert, but I'm sure there are a few differences between the VRC DSR mode and if you made a client specifically for DSR.

I personally like the idea.  I mean who doesn't want to be realistic around here?

7
General Discussion / Check-In Responsibility
« on: April 20, 2010, 09:45:14 AM »
Quote from: Brian Pryor
Politics comes into play at some level anywhere through life , at work, at school etc. VATSIM is by no means exempt from that.  I don't know your age Andrew but by the time one reaches an adult they should be able to identify that.

Sometimes I personally think it's better to let sleeping dogs...well sleep rather than resurrect them 2 months later.

So you can't post observations on Forums anymore? Imagine that.

I would sort of call it resurection, but then again someone else would have replied and this thread would be blown out again.

I don't agree with "Well since it has been xx months/days/years etc, therefore you can't post anymore".  Its a free country right?  You can post if you want to, as long as it is within the CoC obviously and isn't harassment to another induvidual.

And VATSIM is a very political place, just look at the staff forums.  My policy is to stay out of it as much as possible and nobody will attack you.  The "If you don't talk to them, they won't talk to you"  has worked so far.

If people want to make their point, and argue til Kingdom Come, thats fine with me, but do it in a PM.

8
Virtual Airlines / Southwest Virtual is looking for ACTIVE pilots!
« on: April 03, 2010, 10:37:51 PM »
Quote from: Brian Pryor
If he had said something directed at Mike (ie: John Doe fails in comparison to Jane Doe) then it'd be a different circumstance.

So correcting his grammar like he did is not directed at Mike?  just wondering.

Also, Why does this stuff have to happen here?  All Mike is doing is trying to get the word out on an Airline and nothing else.  Who cares if he has a few mispellings or the grammar isn't right? It isn't fair to that person to be "called out" on it.  And if someone was to bring it up, why not send a PM? does it have to be displayed in the sarcastic tone (I thought it was sarcasm)?  Unless it goes deeper than that......

9
The Control Room Floor / atc test
« on: March 02, 2010, 02:17:54 AM »
Quote from: Patrick Hramika
I was taking the test for cle atc trainning and hit a wrong button and lost the test...Can I recover the test which I have tried and tried....but to no avail...how do I take the test again???
Was it one of our SOP tests or the VATUSA S1 test.  if it is the S1 test I think the wait period is 7 days?  if it is an SOP test from us, I can reassign it.

10
General Discussion / What we need to be discussing
« on: February 20, 2010, 09:11:46 PM »
Quote from: AJ Heiser
IMO, if you want to strive for as much realism as possible, that's great! Just don't be a prick about it.
Interesting the way you put that

11
General Discussion / Who is the final authority?
« on: February 18, 2010, 09:31:22 PM »
And I thought this was going to be a boring weekend

12
General Discussion / Andrew Murfin goes for his Cleveland Center Cert
« on: January 08, 2010, 03:24:12 PM »
Hello!

On Saturday, January 9th from 2300z-0100z, Andrew Murfin will take the ultamite test in whether he can handle the Center position.  All I ask of you is to be a pilot.  Do anything you deem neccessary.  VFR on top? Diversions? Holds?  You do whatever you feel is neccessary to test him on his skills.

Hope to see you there!

13
General Discussion / FSINN Connection PLZ HELP
« on: September 16, 2009, 03:34:53 PM »
Quote from: Sean Hunt
ok so i went to that page... and i went to the current ip address for vatsim... and copied and pasted it into vatsim and it works   but now when i am in vatsim i click the ATC page and nothing shows.... now wut am i doing wrong?

Probably no ATC on in the area

14
The Control Room Floor / VRC hates Hardware Acceleration
« on: August 30, 2009, 11:54:14 AM »
Quote from: Alex Bailey
There has been a member confirm that the procedure above does in fact solve the problem. Thought it would be worth mentioning.

yeah it works for me. The picture is fuzzy, obviously. but it is a small price to pay.

15
General Discussion / VATUSA Website and Data Systems
« on: May 31, 2009, 09:03:36 AM »
yes Thank You for everything you are doing.

Pages: [1]