Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Kyle Sanders

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 9
16
News / Re: New Salt Lake ATM selected
« on: June 29, 2021, 09:05:37 PM »
HEAR HEAR!

CONGRATS Nate!

17
News / Re: June 1, 2021
« on: May 26, 2021, 11:40:27 PM »
Either my phone is messing up and missing important information with this post or… VATUSA is going to explode into a million pieces on June 1st because a bunch of voices were heard…

18
News / Re: June 1, 2021
« on: May 26, 2021, 11:17:18 PM »
Either my phone is messing up and missing important information with this post or… VATUSA is going to explode into a million pieces on June 1st because a bunch of a bunch of voices were heard…

19
General Discussion / Re: Events
« on: May 21, 2021, 05:31:44 PM »
No “REQUIREMENTS” to join.

We (ATC) however, do ask that you know how to fly your plane, program the FMC, understand basic phraseology, and not use these events to learn how to do these things.

If you don’t understand something, ask.

If you get overwhelmed, consider discontinuing that specific flight and try again during a non-event level traffic time.

Have fun!

20
The VLL system in these clients are setup but not used by me or my facility. I don't like the old way of setting these up and have an idea to make the system more useable and realistic in mind.

So right now we use Discord to communicate intra/inter-facility but it is a pain.

Funny that this should be posted today as just earlier I posted a topic asking for collaboration with this project.
https://forums.vatsim.net/topic/31317-virtual-landline-software-development/

21
The Flight Deck / Re: "exit when able, taxi to the ramp on this frequency"
« on: February 09, 2021, 11:12:14 PM »
7110.65 2-1-17 for further reference.
Quote

In situations where the controller does not want the pilot to change frequency but the pilot is expecting or may want a frequency change, use the following phraseology.
PHRASEOLOGY−
REMAIN THIS FREQUENCY.

22
News / Re: New TA at ZSE
« on: January 30, 2021, 06:12:58 PM »
Good Choice

23
USA Division Updates / Re: Division Meeting Minutes Jan 16, 2021
« on: January 23, 2021, 09:49:13 AM »
“VATUSA guidance for use of VATSIM Frequency Information Management policy has been posted in the forums.”

Where may I find this?

24
The Control Room Floor / Re: ORD 6 Departure CVS vs MAINTAIN
« on: December 24, 2020, 03:29:33 PM »
Before I even dive into this. I'm curious to how an "incident" occured from climb via SID vs maintain. What exactly happened?
The following discussion was inspired by an incident on the network that I was not part of and I am not here to speak about that incident but rather the specifics for interpreting the .65 in a very specific situation.

I would rather just focus on the intellectual part rather than the drama that originally surrounded it.

25
The Control Room Floor / ORD 6 Departure CVS vs MAINTAIN
« on: December 24, 2020, 02:04:31 PM »
The following discussion was inspired by an incident on the network that I was not part of and I am not here to speak about that incident but rather the specifics for interpreting the .65 in a very specific situation.

I would like to know why KORD (even real world) issues Climb Via SID for the O'Hare 6 departure and hopefully learn something.

https://aeronav.faa.gov/d-tpp/2013/00166OHARE.PDF

https://aeronav.faa.gov/d-tpp/2013/00166OHARE_C.PDF.


7110.65 4-3-2.e.4:

Use one of the following when the SID contains published crossing restrictions:
A) Instruct aircraft to “Climb via SID.”"
B) Instruct the aircraft to “Climb via SID except maintain (altitude)” when a top altitude is not published or when it is necessary to issue an interim altitude.


The ORD 6 does have published crossing restrictions, so “Climb Via SID” is used at this moment.
However, if we go down to 7110.65 4-3-2.e.5 right after it:


“When a SID does not contain published crossing restrictions and/or is a SID with a Radar Vector segment or a Radar Vector SID; or a SID is constructed with a Radar Vector segment and contains published crossing restrictions after the vector segment, instruct aircraft to “MAINTAIN (altitude).”

Or simply put:
If "Y' to any of the following, issue: "MAINTAIN"
1) When a SID does not contain published crossing restrictions
2) SID with a Radar Vector segment
3) Radar Vector SID
4) SID is constructed with a Radar Vector segment and contains published crossing restrictions after the vector segment
      

Considering the answer is yes to #'s 2 and 3, I would now think that “Maintain” is now required.

So the way I see it is:

1) Since we came to an answer before getting to paragraph 5, we stop there an use that... so “Climb Via SID”, or...
2) KORD has special authorization to use Climb Via SID, or...
3) I am misunderstanding something.




I am pretty sure that scenario #1 isn't right because that would make the KSLC ARCHZ departure a “Climb VIA SID” yet it is “Maintain” in real world along with the fact that it perfectly fits into the last condition of paragraph 5.

Scenario 2 would be understandable.

Scenario 3 would be likely.

26
The Control Room Floor / Re: All DPs and STARs Facility Files
« on: December 21, 2020, 12:52:58 AM »
Yes it’s from NASR. 100% plan to share source code publicly as soon as it is out of alpha... hopefully just a few more days.

27
The Control Room Floor / All DPs and STARs Facility Files
« on: December 19, 2020, 03:50:52 PM »
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/8yganz4g9q5lipb/AACOps2znlLWWr9hpf41mSSza?dl=0

This includes SCT2 and GEOMAP diagrams for all STARS and DPs (including graphical ODPs) that aren't considered "RADAR VECTORED".

There may be a few errors here and there but this will get everyone a base map if you aren't already up to date.

28
The Flight Deck / Re: Back into VATSIM After a Long Break ... A Few Q's
« on: November 07, 2020, 05:26:26 PM »
1-If the airport diagram has a statement similar to “ASDE-X in use. Operate transponders with altitude reporting mode and ADS-B (if equipped) enabled on all airport surfaces.”.... yes. Other than that, operate per the CFRs/AIM.

2-After you get airborne, most VASTIM ATC will advise you that you are RADAR contact and ask for your altitude, this is a VATSIM’sim because in RW, it happens the way you describe. I would say it is a good rule of thumb that if they haven’t said anything to you by the time you are 400’agl, checkin like you would RW to the “departure” controller.

3-In these situations, respond with “no preference” if you don’t care. If you care to look up where your real world flight would park, respond with that gate. Ways to find it: google “KSLC AIR CARRIER GATES” or something like that. You may be able to find something simple like the following image. Others may be able to provide a better way have handling this.
https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-9KQvLhl6IjE/XHx4Mpp9cAI/AAAAAAAAB8Q/EElZiH-3-PkQzgUxafR1f5jFRGGT2mdKACLcBGAs/s1600/18342646_410607569320086_4230429931510703883_n.jpg

29
The Control Room Floor / Re: NASR NAVAID ISR Generator
« on: October 30, 2020, 02:24:00 PM »
Using Windows 7
Looks like the version is 1.0

Should I download a more recent version?
Did a little research on why most people with Windows 7 can't use my BATCH Files.

My of my files use Powershell to grab data from the internet and does this via Powershell

To do this, the user needs Powershell v3 or higher. v5.1 or later is recommended.

You can do that by downloading the Windows Management Framework:

https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=54616

30
The Control Room Floor / Re: NASR NAVAID ISR Generator
« on: October 28, 2020, 01:19:32 PM »
Using Windows 7
Looks like the version is 1.0

Should I download a more recent version?

My other guy was running Windows 7 as well. I Think that might be the problem. Try to get the most up to date version of Powershell that you can that is compatible with your Windows 7, update, then come back and try my batch file again.

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 9