Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - David Jedrejcic

Pages: [1] 2 3
1
General Discussion / Leaving for a while
« on: July 01, 2011, 05:21:06 PM »
All,

I am sad to announce that I will be leaving VATSIM and all of its assorted enclaves for a while as I attend to an increasing workload both at work and at school.  I have not been able to spend as much time as I would like to with VATSIM, and I don't see any break in the near future.  So I'm going to leave my post to someone who has more time to dedicate, and I am going to concentrate on those things that require it in my life at the moment.  

It has been a great experience working with everyone here, and I can say without hesitation that I have learned more about aviation and ATC than I ever thought I would - and I thank you all for making that possible.  To all of those folks that I have worked closely with, I want to thank you very sincerely for everything once again, and a big shout out to Noah, my first Instructor.  Hope you're doing well man.

I hope things settle down one day in the not too distant future so I can come back and spend some more time with this wonderful hobby, but until then, all the best, and thanks again.

Dave

2
NOTAMs / New ZME ATM Appointed!
« on: April 28, 2011, 03:35:00 AM »
Please help me to congratulate Mark Hubbert on his new appointment as the ZME ATM!  Mark has been a dedicated member of ZME, most recently serving as the DATM, and I'm certain he will help ZME prosper in the future.  Welcome to your new role, Mark - we wish you all the best!

3
NOTAMs / New ZKC ATM Appointed!
« on: March 10, 2011, 02:58:40 PM »
All,

Please help me to congratulate Wes Miles as the new ATM for ZKC ARTCC!  Wes has been serving on the staff for ZKC most recently, and I'm certain he will do wonderful things for ZKC.  Congratulations on your new position, and thanks for stepping up to help your ARTCC!

4
General Discussion / Milsaps will not get away with this one!
« on: January 14, 2011, 12:23:49 AM »
What exactly does he do anyway?  

Lol...  Happy birthday Gary!

5
Then bring it up to Gary.  This method isn't going to accomplish anything, you should know that.

6
Bring it up to your ATD in private - this is not the way to achieve progress.

7
General Discussion / Integrity of the Network
« on: November 15, 2010, 02:57:46 PM »
Quote from: Richard Jenkins
Perhaps it's OTS standards are all over the place within VATSIM? Is that good or bad? Does it allow for diversity giving the student the ability to pick the level of realism that is suitable for them? I think I could argue it from bothsides.

I don't know if I would say the standards are "all over the place", but certainly there are differences in the way things are run from ARTCC to ARTCC, and obviously from Division to Division.  I think that's perfectly fine, not "good or bad".  Although I see the benefit of having a GRP that dictates at least a minimal amount of conformity across VATSIM, I also think it's acceptable for different ARTCCs to have slightly different ways of operating, training, etc.  VATUSA would be a little more bland IMHO if every ARTCC had to administer every OTS in the same exact manner as every other ARTCC.  If a student joins an ARTCC and finds it to be not enough realism, they can pretty quickly get the scoop from their colleagues and find out where to go in order to get as real as they want to.  If they find themselves in a very regimented program and wish to have a little more fun and a little less studying, I'm sure they will find where they need to go as well.  Both kinds of programs have merit, and I support the ARTCC being able to dictate what kind of facility they will sponsor (within reason).  I, myself, am not a huge fan of the ultra-realism point of view, but some folks are - and they have places they can flourish.  Thankfully, I can also find an ARTCC that suits my somewhat more relaxed needs, and everybody has somewhere to call home.

8
The Flight Deck / Pilots flying JAX, MLB, DAB and MCO/ORL/SFB
« on: October 04, 2010, 02:15:00 AM »
Since I misinterpreted the rules and gave ZJX a premature authorization to operate as a major, I'll take the blame for their troubles, but I had to ask them to shut down major ops until this was taken care of - certainly not what I had planned to do.  And it certainly wasn't through any fault of ZJX.  Just a bureaucratic hiccup.  Looks like things will be back up soon though, so that's good news.

9
The Flight Deck / Pilots flying JAX, MLB, DAB and MCO/ORL/SFB
« on: September 23, 2010, 03:38:48 PM »
Gary, Bryan,

Thanks for clearing that up for me - I figured this was the case, but..  In all fairness, I think it would have been nice to see the wording in the GRP say something like "All CTR positions that include a Major airspace are thereby Major" rather than taking the opposite tack of saying "No CTR positions are Designated Airspaces except for the following Special Centers" and then having us reason that CTR airspaces must be treated as major because of the top-down structure.  It makes it hard to understand the intent.  Anyways, thanks for the answers.

For the rest of the conversation, I don't see any reason or know of any examples where the CTR airspace is manned by a controller that does not have Major certifications.  It is my interpretation of Gary's and Bryan's reponses that a C1 can only control a CTR position if they have the certifications for the Major airspaces below it, period.  If there are no Major airspaces below it, then a C1 is good to go at CTR without any certs.  It makes sense to me, I just don't see it expressly written in the GRP, that's all.

10
The Flight Deck / Pilots flying JAX, MLB, DAB and MCO/ORL/SFB
« on: September 20, 2010, 01:00:15 PM »
Ok, excellent - thanks for the info.  I have one question since I'm talking with all my ATMs about this at the moment...

If an ARTCC has a Major facility, how is it that their CTR position is not expressly defined in the GRP as a Designated Airspace?  I hope you see my question, and I'm sure it's been answered years ago, but since we're talking about it now, I'd just like to make sure we're doing everything right...  Can a visiting C1 come in and control ZXX_CTR if they don't have a certification to control at the Major facility KXYZ included in the airspace?  I'm supposing that they cannot, in fact, do this - it simply wouldn't make sense.  But the GRP specifically says that a CTR airspace is not a Major airport or a Designated Airspace by default, so...  Do I tell my ATMs to treat their CTR airspace as something that requires certification (if it includes a Major facility), or that if it's not specifically listed in the GRP document, that their CTR facility is controllable by any C1 without any certifications?

11
The Flight Deck / Pilots flying JAX, MLB, DAB and MCO/ORL/SFB
« on: September 19, 2010, 03:23:01 PM »
Bryan,

Alright, well if that's the official word, then I'll go ahead and instruct my ATMs that their airports are not major until listed on the GRP itself.  Any idea how long the process above should take?  This will be a first question from the ATMs - does it take a week to get approved (or rejected) by VATUSA or more?  Does it take a month to get approved (or rejected) by the EC and to be listed on the GRP or more?  I would just like to know what the intended turnaround for this is, roughly speaking.

Thanks,
Dave

12
The Flight Deck / Pilots flying JAX, MLB, DAB and MCO/ORL/SFB
« on: September 19, 2010, 02:27:29 AM »
For all those concerned, yes the ZJX ATM asked me how could they get KMCO to be a Designated Airspace.  I pointed them to the VATUSA website where they could request that an airspace be considered by the ruling authorities as such.  Since I am not part of the process that decides this (the EC does), I subsequently informed them that when and if they see their facility listed on the VATUSA page under "Approved Major Airports" (see link here http://www.vatusa.net/major_apt_list.php, then they could go ahead and treat it as a major airport.  I don't claim to have any knowledge of how this was decided, or how it was listed up on the VATUSA page, but being that it was, they had at least my permission to use KMCO as a major airport, I will vouch for that.

I now understand that the link Norman sent is the official authority on what is and what is not desingated airspace.  I will not refer ATMs to the VATUSA list anymore, but I think obviously that should either be kept up to date or taken down altogether, so as not to cause confusion.  

Daniel, thanks for forwarding this post to the rest of the folks at ZJX, but they are under the impression that KMCO is major because of what I just said above.  They should continue to follow their current procedures until Gary gets the status "worked out" as he mentioned above.  I'm not going to ask them to change their policies and procedures on a temporary basis, as I've a feeling that Gary will come back to us with a ruling shortly, and then I'll ask them to take actions if necessary.  I understand that during this short, interim period, KMCO will be operating as a major airfield (as they have been since May), even though it is not officially listed in the link that Norman listed above.  We'll get a ruling shortly, and then we'll do what needs to be done.

13
NOTAMs / Congrats to the New VATUSA1!
« on: April 29, 2010, 12:29:23 AM »
Sincerely, I think this is superb news for VATUSA, and well worth the wait.  Gary, it's a pleasure to see you back at the helm, and I'm looking forward to working with you.

14
General Discussion / All but 3 Centers On
« on: March 27, 2010, 12:04:49 AM »
I saw that when I came home, and if I would have had privileges to light up one of the others, I would have.  It's always a good thing to see. Especially when all the Southern Region is present and accounted for   Good job, guys!

15
General Discussion / VATNA Website Question
« on: March 19, 2010, 07:24:39 PM »
Point taken.

Pages: [1] 2 3