116
« on: November 08, 2010, 07:58:50 AM »
I know, for me, that it's sad to see both Ian and Mike go. Both of them were great guys and helped establish ZLA as one of the premier ARTCC's. Will this open the "flood-gates" as someone already stated? Absolutely. We will continue to see, quite frankly, horrible pilots and ATC has to walk them through each step just to get them off the ground. Once they actually start flying, it's another story. That's not what I've volunteered my time for. I volunteered to control with realism (as much as VATSIM allows); not babysitting. Hell, being on VATSIM has significantly influenced my life. I'm now going to school to get a CTI certificate and actually control for real. That's what this network has allowed me to do.
This hardline stance by the BoG is showing me that they are, simply, out of touch. They appear to not want to work with division staff on finding ways to better both sides, pilot and controller. While the pilot ratings are the first step forward, its essentially less than a baby step. These ratings are not mandatory, and honestly, I'm not sure how many people want to spend the time on them. I know I'm not. I feel that I'm at a good enough level as a pilot to listen and respond to orders correctly.
This fundamental shift in thinking should be a wake up call to the BoG/Founders. If you want to continue to lose some of your best USA controllers, keep going down this path, and see where it takes you.