Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Dave Weese

Pages: [1]
1
Events / Re: [1 JUN 2019, 1630Z - 2230Z] ZNY Live Event in Newark, NJ
« on: June 02, 2019, 06:23:48 PM »


What restriction are you talking about?

The bookings all had real world airline flights attached to them, I understand that's because it's real world ops. The email that came to our VA about the event however. Made it sound like you had to fly under the callsign for the flight you booked.

That's why we didnt promote the event withing our VA.

If that's not the case, need to be a little more clear with that for future events.


2
Events / Re: [1 JUN 2019, 1630Z - 2230Z] ZNY Live Event in Newark, NJ
« on: June 02, 2019, 12:03:25 PM »
Need to remove the airline callsign restriction for the next event. Our VA is not a backed by a real world airline, and our guys wanted to fly this. However having to fly as a different airline, in a different livery was not something they wanted to do. So we did not promote this event.

3
Events / Re: [06/28 2300z] Hit The Beach ZDC FNO
« on: June 02, 2019, 11:56:17 AM »
Not to sound like a Debbie Downer, but are we sure Norfolk can handle FNO traffic?  That's a lot of traffic for such a small airport.. :-\

4
General Discussion / Re: Question about FNO events
« on: March 31, 2018, 01:07:55 PM »
Many VATSIM pilots cannot successfully execute many of the procedures they file,
I think this might be the main crux of the matter.  Dave, you made a statement in your initial post that "Pilots know how to fly holds."  I'm not sure if that is outdated information or based on a sampling of Canadian Xpress pilots who probably have a higher incidence of procedural understanding than the general VATSIM public.  But I think, at least in my anecdotal observation on the network and here in the forums, that the overall average level of IFR procedural knowledge among the average VATSIM user is not what it was years ago.  That is what has partially fueled the push for the ATO program, where organizations like mine are trying like crazy to up the overall level of knowledge among pilots on the network.  But, we have a tall task ahead of us in that endeavor.

Rob, you make a good point. I agree, I don't think pilots have the understandings of the procedures as we did in the past. The aircraft we have today, have taken away the need for basic understanding of what the procedure means. Saying that however, I think the average pilot does know how to 'push the right buttons' for lack of a better term,  to make the aircraft do what they want. They may not understand what it means, but they understand what button to push on the FMC.

And yes, a lot of us at Canadian Xpress have been around this for many years. We are also a VATSIM ATO partner as well, and try very hard to get our own members to take some of the training we offer, and most have.

Maybe we need a secret code for vPilot that will tell ATC how smart we are, so we get front of the line  ;)

5
General Discussion / Re: Question about FNO events
« on: March 31, 2018, 08:48:12 AM »
I don't know specifically which events you refer to, but, I can tell you that a lot of times in my experience flying into an airport that has had a major configuration change since the default FSX scenery was created, a significant portion of the inbound pilots' systems will be missing any new runways that have been added.  So whereas at Atlanta you'd ordinarily have three parallel arrival streams coming in, in VATSIM you might only have the southernmost runway at 5-10% capacity because so many don't have it.  Most of us that have been around a while know look at the ARTCC website for information and/or where to find scenery updates but many do not know or don't take the time to do so.

For sure this is a problem, O'Hare is the best example of this.

But I'm not talking about scenery issues. And I'm not going to call out any one event. But one that sticks out as really foolish was one last fall where the real world had a runway closed for line painting or something at 10pm that Friday night. So in the middle of the event with 10times the traffic online then in the real world. The tower controller with support off all other ATC positions, shut down the runway. This created havoc for everyone. Sure this might be an extrem event. But I've flown 85% of the FNOs over the last 2 years. And almost half the time, I've seen runway usage restrictions of some type in place.

There are so many tools already in place for ATC to manager traffic, it just always boggles my mind to see controllers taking pilots off a published route and start vectoring them around 40 and 50 miles out when stacking them at a published hold does the same thing and it's almost zero work for the controller.

6
General Discussion / Question about FNO events
« on: March 30, 2018, 10:13:47 PM »
Hey guys just wondering why some areas on FNO events choice to follow the real world OPS at that time and limit available runways to what the real world is doing?

Seen this 40% of the events over the last year or so. There might be 50 plus aircraft and ATC will only use one runway when there are 2 or more that could be used. Ya the real world might only be using one runway at that time, but they only have 10 or so aircraft in the whole control space.

And why do controllers give themselves so much work? Clear the pilot on the arrival, use the published holds. All this vectoring around, creates way too much work for controllers. Pilots know how to fly a hold, when ATC does use them, I never hear or see any issues.

FNOs are great, and I know they are busy as heck, so why burn yourself out?


Pages: [1]