1
General Discussion / Potential Changes to VATSIM
« on: September 05, 2012, 11:20:45 PM »
Hello Everyone,
I was flying over this past weekend, and the ATC kept logging off. As someone who dislikes UNICOM, this was not anything good. Then I thought, why doesn't VATSIM limit the control type that controllers can log on as to a center within a region (except during events). This way, it is almost guaranteed that a controller will be online, when you step into your aircraft. This should at least be done in VATUSA, so each ARTCC can be covered during the day. This has been demonstrated with LAX_CTR, when one person controlled everything in ZLA. Besides this, VATSIM is a great way to get a full flight experience. If there is any other way that VATSIM could improve. Please feel free to post.
Best regards,
Michael Marsh Jr.
[img]http://www.zonexecutive.com/lib/signatures/ZE229.png\\\" border=\\\"0\\\" class=\\\"linked-image\\\" /]
I was flying over this past weekend, and the ATC kept logging off. As someone who dislikes UNICOM, this was not anything good. Then I thought, why doesn't VATSIM limit the control type that controllers can log on as to a center within a region (except during events). This way, it is almost guaranteed that a controller will be online, when you step into your aircraft. This should at least be done in VATUSA, so each ARTCC can be covered during the day. This has been demonstrated with LAX_CTR, when one person controlled everything in ZLA. Besides this, VATSIM is a great way to get a full flight experience. If there is any other way that VATSIM could improve. Please feel free to post.
Best regards,
Michael Marsh Jr.
[img]http://www.zonexecutive.com/lib/signatures/ZE229.png\\\" border=\\\"0\\\" class=\\\"linked-image\\\" /]