Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Matthew Ballew

Pages: [1]
1
Virtual Airlines / Announcing Boutique Virtual - The most Advanced VA
« on: January 03, 2016, 04:41:28 PM »
Boutique Virtual will be launching this year. We will one of the most professional Virtual Airlines on VATSIM. With everything from FAA based training/testing to Dispatchers, the next big thing in VATSIM is here.

At this point, however, we lack the staff to launch. Take a look at this SOP https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6NrDh-L966VbWlMLWdGdkxQZDA/view?usp=sharing

While are going to be one of the most advanced Virtual Airlines, we definitely will not be the largest. This will ensure our pilots are of good quality, and our training/dispatch staff can properly tend to all of our pilot at once. So please take a look through this extracted part of the SOP, specifically the staff positions. At this point all positions are open.

Should you feel you meet the requirements, contact me. We can setup in interview in the coming weeks.

2
General Discussion / Re: FSS/Flight Watch
« on: December 26, 2015, 07:55:25 PM »
I am on a tablet, so this is going to be brief  ;)

I started this conversation because I saw most of Europe had FSS online. To my surprise however these controllers did not provide the services I was expexting.

As to the demand of FSS, although not great, I think it would be appreciated by actual and student pilots, as well as attract more VFR pilots. I as a controller would love to see VFR traffic, and would appreciate the practice.

Perhaps are larger combined FSS would assist in providing as much coverage with as little controller expenditure as possible.

Overall I think this is possible, and would be beneficial to pilots and controllers alike. I would like nothing more than to be able to call up the perhaps USA combined FSS and filing my flight plan, as well as receiving my WX brief.

Overall I think FSS would be easy to achieve, academically beneficial, and attract new and perhaps more......professional members


3
General Discussion / Re: FSS/Flight Watch
« on: December 25, 2015, 07:48:16 PM »
I just tested the following setup on VATSIM with a supervisors approval. I am only an S1, so I am sure there are other ways to accomplish this.

Since I am an S1 I could not select FSS under the position type, thusly I was logged in a MCI_TEST_DEL with a range of 600NM

Primed and Receiving to my Headset on 122.100

Receiving to my headset on 112.4, Columbus FSS-Pawnee City VOR

With the help of a friendly pilot, we were able to determine that  with some switching of primed freq I was able to receive from the pilot on 122.1, and respond on 112.4. However this system would be troublesome to setup and manage, so I propose using just one frequency for two way radio communication. Additional and easier circumstances likely exist for C1+ rated controllers. FSS should be possible, and I think would be an amazing addition to VATSIM.

4
General Discussion / Re: FSS/Flight Watch
« on: December 25, 2015, 06:56:49 PM »
What service would they be providing VATSIM pilots? Same as in the world (opening and closing VFR flight plans, providing weather information, etc.) or did you have other or further tasks in mind?

FSS Staffers Would have the normal duties of an FSS control, plus that of Flight Watch. They will have access to a radar screen in order to assist in determining the exact location of an aircraft. However they would not provide vectors out of severe weather.

FSS may choose to serve an entire ARTCC, or just one FSS. For example, in ZKC there are the McAlester FSS, Jonesboro FSS, Columbia FSS, Wichita FSS, and StLouis FSS. During busy times in ZKC, an FSS Staffer may only service Columbia, Wichita and StLouis FSS. During less busy times, an FSS staffer may service the entire ARTCC. Staffers may share service, even if they are operating the same FSS.

Comms are not easily set up for this type of situation. Some VORS have two-way comms, on a different frequency, some receive on the standard 122.1 and transmit on another, some receive and transmit completely differently. I know that vPilot supports transmitting on one frequency, and monitoring another. I also know you can listen in VRC to multiple freq. and alternate your transmissions. Staffers could even log in, and not appear as a new controller, instead listening on all or just a few VORS, waiting to respond. Or, you could opt for a more simple system, one where all pilots transmit on 122.1, but listen in on their closest accepted VOR, which would be listed in the controllers information. This would assist the staffer in determining the aircrafts location, while assisting in keeping things simple.

I am testing some of my theories on VATSIM right now, Ill get back to you.



5
General Discussion / FSS/Flight Watch
« on: December 25, 2015, 04:25:34 PM »
I really would like to see FSS/Flight Watch Controllers. It would be easy to accomplish, and provide an amazing service to pilots.

Pages: [1]