1) I believe my posts are productive in that I am illustrating the many faults of our RD, who disregards the rights of members. Such as when Conflict Resolution procedures sit in his inbox unanswered. Further illustrating that his rules prevent the Division Director, and ATMs from doing their jobs. Choosing to ignore the rule as opposed to fixing it, is not a valid argument.
2) I believe my posts are professional as I include the reasons behind my arguments, using facts as opposed to opinion.
3) I believe my posts are helpful with reference to point 1 & 2.
4) I believe my posts are respectful. Unfortunately, I cannot control the frame of mind people are in when they read my posts.
5) My posts are generally good natured, pointed, but good natured, and posted in the spirit of furthering discussion to fix the problem.
6) I believe my posts are intelligent, and well thought out. Just because I don't come right out with a "snappy comeback" doesn't mean I didn't have one ready. Contrary to popular belief, I do not respond without having thought things through.
So there, your questions are answered. I trust there is enough substance in them to further the debate. What "spear" are you referring to?
Thanks,
JV
