Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - James Hiscoe

Pages: [1]
1
The real take away here is always report your altitude and climb instructions on departure for an easy and smooth experience.  8)

2
Worth noting that a pilot reporting their altitude is only really necessary to perform a Mode C verification so that the Mode C altitude can be used to assure vectors above MVA and separation from other aircraft (or when not using Mode C to provide separation through other means). Its not necessary for radar identification or issuing climbs or descents in this case. This is probably, if it went exactly as described, a VATSIMism where the controller(s) doesn't realize or is in the habit of acting as if mode C verification and radar identification are one and the same or should be achieved at the same time before issuing climbs and informing the pilot of radar contact.

So to your initial question it doesn't really make sense per the rules to withold radar ID and climb instructions in lieu of an altitude report from a departure. If they witheld vectors that'd be another story altogether.

3
The Classroom (Controller Tips) / Re: Euroscope Set Up
« on: October 12, 2019, 06:56:54 PM »
I am struggling to understand the configuration file structure and workflow in using them.

Welcome to the club.

4
The Control Room Floor / Re: Event Timelapses!
« on: April 08, 2019, 07:05:26 PM »
The theme for this evening: "Whats a localizer?"

5
News / Re: New VATUSA13
« on: April 01, 2019, 10:09:34 PM »
Congrats.

6
The Control Room Floor / Re: "Limited Services"
« on: March 28, 2019, 10:52:14 PM »
Those are GRP items, so they should be taught be demonstrate proficiency in nonradar procedures before being issued ratings.  I know it's rare in most places, so I hope we at least have our folks in a place to remember how to look it up when they forget.  Not knowing isn't an excuse to cop out.

Its not an excuse, but its at least a comprehensible explanation. I'd sooner expect that confusion than someone deliberately copping out of a service they know how to provide. But I think this speculation at this point has lost sight of the total absence of examples to suggest something more than what Dhruv has described is going on with the 'one known person'. I also agree about how its pretty easy to navigate these limits without making a point of discussing it or warning pilots.

7
The Control Room Floor / Re: "Limited Services"
« on: March 28, 2019, 12:52:21 PM »
The only understandable reason to use it as an excuse is if they're unfamiliar or uncertain of how to provide services or instructions or clearances outside of radar coverage. Otherwise they're acting in bad faith. I'm not sure which is more likely, probably the former if anything I'd hope.

I don't see ground movement or clearance delivery as something one would typically refer to as "non radar" though. Non radar to me describes things involving airborne or soon to be airborne aircraft without radar service. The glossary in the 7110.65 seems to agree. One doesn't even need to use top down mode to issue taxi instructions so its hard to see it as an excuse to not do top down tower cab service at least prior to departure even if somehow the people in question were unaware they had that feature in vERAM.

8
The Control Room Floor / Re: "Limited Services"
« on: March 27, 2019, 04:54:33 PM »
Radar coverage below certain altitudes is the thing that strikes me as most likely to be what they're referring to. I'm not sure what else they could mean.

9
The Control Room Floor / Re: Good Operating Practices for TRACON
« on: February 22, 2019, 02:34:02 AM »
F.) Be aware of your own limits. Ask for help, or an extra set of eyes to help you scan if your feeling “pushed”. If necessary don’t be afraid to tell a pilot, “unable”. Use hand off’s instead of point outs, or allow another controller to coordinate for you, to lessen your workload.

Quote
D.) When particularly busy it is just as important to “control the frequencies” as it is to control the planes. Be confident, concise, and quick with transmissions. As you’re making one transmission, prepare the next one and go right to it before another pilot can break in.

These two things are so important to me on VATSIM when it gets busy. Hitting that personal growth moment when you realize no matter how adept you think you are sometimes you need to get some extra eyes or split off an entire sector to make you do a better job. And controlling the freq with VATSIM pilots especially is key. I find myself anticipating the delay due to the codec by keying up a half second before the readback is done.

10
General Discussion / Re: Mode C Transponders
« on: December 10, 2018, 04:22:17 PM »
I'm having a hard time conveying my point. My point is, the rule regarding Mode C transponders is slightly absurd. There is no rule in real life stating that I must have my transponder on when I'm clear of the Mode C Veil.

In real life they also don't have a contactme feature to instruct hapless pilots who have no idea where they are to check in. However as pointed out there are rules beyond the Mode C veil, but clearly that's separate from desiring to simulate a thing like a Cub.

I'm honestly not bothered by non mode C or even non transponder if it were one out of many with one and I've had to deal with it occasionally due to apparent pilot error or some kind of bug in their client so its actually a necessary situation to be able to handle skill wise in my opinion. You can't just argue that reality lets you do this so on the network you should expect to be able to though. The CoC has no requirement to match reality exactly. I'd personally be happy if we had a provision put into the CoC that allows non ModeC/transponder operation as a controller consent thing just like emergencies. Until then though....

11
The Classroom (Controller Tips) / Re: S46 16C Final Approach Vectors
« on: August 14, 2018, 04:41:02 AM »
This video's influence on my own virtual education in terminal radar has ensured that I will be applying one day to visit Seattle Center if only to be able to say "170 to SODOE" on freq.

With respect to the Bailout Tools DX mentioned this really is a masterclass in using the whole toolbox. My two favourites are using the Husky Stadium visual approach when a pilot can't pick up the traffic but sees the stadium and in another case changing a heavy that's following a Brasilia to the left side runway because it became clear they wouldn't have adequate spacing to the threshold. This way as long as the Heavy doesn't overrun the lighter aircraft with visual sep in place he's maintained his sequence. This video really made me love doing plane to plane. Also I think the way he speaks really influenced my own speaking on freq. Its so strong and crisp and clear and the speed is so measured. Its so important to be that way when you're rattling off even the partial PTAC with speeds and visual sep in there. I know that over time I've noticed I've had less and less issue with pilot comprehension even when giving relatively verbose clearances.

Also note that even he makes errors. There's a point where he transposes the callsign for two similar numbered Empire flights. Even the masters aren't perfect.

12
The Classroom (Controller Tips) / Re: Let's Talk VFR
« on: May 05, 2018, 07:00:42 AM »
Man, you think the 7110.65 is a long, exhaustive document until you realize how many orders and notices there are...

Every rule needs a full time bureaucracy to keep track of all the required exceptions. :D

13
Change 1 is already out!

14
General Discussion / Re: Question about FNO events
« on: April 03, 2018, 02:52:56 AM »
Ironically flying /W all the time reveals how little some controllers have to deal with that. "Unable direct - DC9" throws a lot of them off it seems. I had more than one guy think I was somehow incompetent. "You got the default GPS right?" "No, just the VOR"

15
Strangely I've always given my taxi instructions this way just because of VATSIM pilots being exceptional at hearing what they want to hear and ignoring the rest, that and runway crossings at MSP (the only place I've ever really done anything) tend to involve a transfer of control to tower when they're departing. I witnessed 2 runway incursions a couple events ago when I had the luxury of monitoring without having a fixed role at the start of the event and the full taxi instructions past the hold short seemed to encourage not holding short.

I also noticed that it wasn't 1300 feet between centrelines until 7110.65X, as the W only says 1000 feet. I wonder if that means I can use Delta at MSP to give the ole' multi runway crossing instruction now.

Pages: [1]