Any special procedures or NOTAMs?  Or being treated as a "normal" Class D towered field during the event?

If you don't mind me asking... What was so bad about? They seem to be able to do it over in Europe without issues.

Sure, some top reasons (personal opinion):

-It detracts from the realism for me (as a controller and pilot), and would likely detract from my own interest/participation
-It is a level of consolidation I do not want to see in the division (or network)
-It would be an unnecessary logistical challenge for marginal (if any) gain; again opinion.  I would rather see how the VATUSA Academy plays out again in terms of activity and participation, assuming that is the basis of your question.  Is morphing airspace truly necessary?
-Adding to logistics, it would require an unprecedented change to air traffic procedures and policies that would have to be written very smartly.
-There's plenty of airspace that gets busy enough, especially during high-visibility events.  The last thing I want is to add thousands of miles more of responsibility.  My brain isn't getting any younger and I certainly don't want to reduce the quality of service I provide.

Very good.  Would be great to see some more staffing there.

How will this affect current ZAK-endorsed controllers?