The next time that I say that one of your controllers is not fit to do their job, and poke fun at their lack of timeliness on a particular issue even though I know they are not being paid to do what they do, and then imply that they are not treating their constituents in a fair and equitable manner, and then accuse them of covering up alleged misuses of their powers, all in a public forum, then you can call it mistreatment of your controllers. Especially if I do it every day of the week. It is this type of behavior that I am calling to the table, and I feel that I am well within my limits as a VATUSA member, and a VATUSA staff member to do so if nobody else is going to say anything about it.
When we take staff positions we should expect members to disagree with decisions we make and criticize our actions. It has happened a few times recently to me, actually earlier today Jason criticized my supervision of one of my staff members just today. I'll take his criticism, use it to review the way that I conduct business and respond to him with my findings expeditiously as I do all complaints. Now if I publicly went after one of my controllers in our forums I am sure I would never hear the end of it. So I don't view criticism of a staff member the same as I do of a regular member.
Edited because I realized I don't know ow to use the correct tense
