I think your ATM would agree that one way Atlanta should not be represented (along with any other ARTCC or VATSIM subset) is through profanity on a public forum, especially when it's coupled with an attitude.
Actually, do not agree. Why? Because it shows willingness to not back down and willingness to stand up for himself and for the ARTCC. Is there some things I would have said differently or omitted? Yes, but I still think we need to stand up for both ourselves and our ARTCC, thus my tolerance of the messages.
Although, I do mind when people assume or make inferences about me, that is when I get irritated.
Mr. Kosmoski,
What I, nor the Events Coordinator appreciate, is informing us we should correct the name of
our event because it does not fit the criteria
you are used to seeing or you would like to see. Let's look at this quote from earlier in the discussion: "If we're not allowed to question things, what are we doing here in the first place? Most things aren't questioned until somebody bothers to ask the question."
If you want to continue to ask questions about banners, event names, or other irrelevant information regarding events, in the future, I would consider taking a different approach to raising such questions, as you can clearly see the current approach was not received well.
Each ARTCC has different reasons for putting names for their events which may not be known to someone who is not within the ARTCC. I believe this entire thread is could have been avoided if the name of ZTL's, not Mr. Kosmoski's, event was accepted as something to which will not change. With those final remarks, I am going to conclude this discussion here. If it were to continue, I do not see any good coming from it. Matthew, if you wish to discuss further, please feel free to send me an email, and I will get to it when I have time.
See you Friday.